5 comments on “Syracuse’s Snowless Streak Ends

  1. Hey, look at that! The Over/Under on when the debate for changing the measurement rules and locations was set at December 10th. I took the Under, looks like I win!

    On a more serious note, the reason why the airports are chosen for here is because they are the official readings. Had the official measurements been taken at the Carrier Dome (as an example), then the Carrier Dome readings would have been used here. There just aren't any other reliable sources at this time.

    One thing I might keep track of this season is a percentage from average calculation, just to get an idea of how much more (or less) snow the cities have. Of course, I also wanted to keep track of precipitation stats over on goldensnowglobe.com, and that hasn't worked out so well.

  2. Uh, are you kidding?

    The Syracuse airport totals are almost ALWAYS higher than the rest of the area. If anything, it gives the Cuse a huge "advantage" over Rochester and Buffalo whose airports are actually located in the least snowy areas of town.

  3. I live in Rochester about two miles east of the airport, and we have had at least three fairly heavy bands move through today, and I'd say at least 4-6 on the ground here, and they say its' supposed to keep going ! Rochester is off to a decent second place start.

    On a side note, I agree with Holly's remark about averaging the snowfall for the five cities. Select 5 or 6 relatively evenly spaced points focused around the downtown area and average them all together. I feel this would give a far more representative tally for all the Golden Snowball cities.

  4. It's too bad we can't somehow average out the Syracuse-area snowfall. I'm in Marcellus, 20 min SE of Syracuse, and we have had at least 15-18" since Saturday morning and it's still coming down hard! I guess we have to take the measurements somewhere, but the airport is often so much lower than the surrounding areas like here.

Comments are closed.